Giving the surge of virtual betting Hit&Miss sports blog asked The Gambling Commission :
Why is there no policing policies for online betting firms who use virtual gaming/betting. When all its creating is more and more problem gamblers.
If I back a virtual horse at sprintvalley all the information regarding virtual race is numbers, names horse, jockey and virtual form? 002100 its a lottery formula used in virtuals.
It just doesn't make sense to allow persons to make a bet from a non physical standpoint. Betting firms will win 95% of the time. How is this allowed ? where is the moral ethics to protect one's mental well being when making inform decisions based on virtual betting.
The Gambling Commission reply :
Thank you for your email regarding virtual betting.
The Gambling Commission (the Commission) permit gambling and ensure:
• It is crime free
• It is fair and open
• children and vulnerable people are protected
The Gambling Act 2005 Section 36(4) allows for virtual gaming and the remote gambling and software technical standards (August 2009) which requires operators to have games independently tested. This independent testing is in place to help ensure, amongst other things that unfair financial impact on customers does not occur.
Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention of the Gambling Commission, we value the information provided as it helps us form a picture of current gambling issues.
Yours Sincerely,
Summary :
It was a blanket cover answer really nothing really answered. How do customer know what is the fairness ratio if any ? is anyway ? Do you agree with reply? We need everyone who reads this blog to click www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk Contact-us Complaints Complaints and help them form a picture of current gambling issues regarding virtual betting and the lack of fairness by betting firms regarding virtual betting lures. The more replies the more we will be heard on issues of virtual betting. #StopVirtualBetting
No comments:
Post a Comment